To comment scroll to the bottom of the entry. Your e-mail address and URL are optional fields.


2007 02 02
Breaking News: City To Fight OMB
The city just issued a press release. In it Mayor Miller challenges the OMB:
"Creative industries drive Toronto's economy and are the focus of the joint Province of Ontario/City of Toronto report 'Imagine a Toronto: Strategies for a Creative City'," said Mayor Miller. "West Queen West is home to a critical mass of artists and others who make Toronto's cultural industry what it is. Unfortunately, the board's decision does not respect that. As a result, the vibrancy and vitality of this neighbourhood and the city's creative community at large is threatened."

In the motion, Mayor Miller and Councillor Giambrone direct City staff to take a number of steps in fighting the decision. The recommended steps are the subject of a confidential report from the City Solicitor but will be made public once approved by Toronto City Council.


The OMB's decision came despite a strong position put forward by City staff working with the community that would have ensured a significant portion of this triangle would be retained for employment purposes including live-work space for artists. The proposal as approved by the OMB will result in a drastic transformation from what was a thriving, mixed community into a block of largely residential-only units.


"We made a strong case at the OMB in favour of appropriate development that properly serves the neighbourhood with parks, affordable housing and space for the cultural industries that already thrive here," Councillor Giambrone said. "I'm delighted that Mayor Miller recognizes the city-wide importance of this cultural hub and supports challenging the board's frustrating decision."


Mayor Miller added that the OMB's decision illustrates the need for the board's functions to be reformed. "The OMB has too much power over municipal issues and has a history of ignoring the needs and desires of local communities," he said. "We must continue to fight these decisions and put the interests of Torontonians first."
[email this story] Posted by R Ouellette on 02/02 at 01:09 PM
  1. I agree that the developments may be oversized for this location BUT I do not agree the cities reasoning that the area should be preserved for artists.

    The natural and recurring cycles within neighbourhoods includes gentrification. Artists make it hip, then the money moves in. That process should not be stopped. Change is absolute since if nothing else, time will deteriorate the surroundings.

    An area that is not being cleaned up by gentrification and renewal (change of hands) is undergoing a slow and painful downfall due to time. All neighbourhoods need new developments, improvements, and new uses. Name a great neighbourhood in Toronto that is the exact same in use as it was 20 years ago? How about 50?

    Time for the artists to move on from West Queen West to newer grounds. Ossington and Queen East are both becoming hip and could use an artists loving touch.

    Posted by  on  02/02  at  09:52 PM
  2. Hi Rod, thanks for the comment. I think the strength of the Active 18 proposal was that it proposed a higher quality development than the one approved by the OMB. That is what is so disturbing about the OMB’s decision and why the city is fighting it.

    Posted by editor  on  02/02  at  11:19 PM
  3. Overall, I have no desire to see the proposed developments overwhelm the Queen West triangle. I believe that in a perfect world we could (and should) get the good things the proposed developments promise without having to give up an artistic community. But I also believe we can, indeed must, take all aspects of the issue into account in this discussion. Aspects that routinely get left out when people discuss the Queen West Triangle include:
    1. The proposed redevelopment includes 199 units of affordable housing. Does it stink that we would have to give up the Queen West triangle to get 200 units of housing for the poor? You bet. With 67,000 people in Toronto in nee of housing, can we discuss proposed affordable housing developments as though they didn't exist? Not on your life.
    2. One of the aspects of this issue that many people, including active 18, focus a lot of emotional energy on concerns 48 Abell. A good deal of energy has gone into the fight for the live/work units there. But it does not do to discuss those units without mentioning that they do not come up to fire code, which makes them a safety of life issue, both for residents and for any fire fighters who have to go into the building to rescue them.
      Posted by John Spragge  on  {comment_date format=’%m/%d’}  at  {comment_date format=’%h:%i %A’}
    3. Posted by John Spragge  on  02/03  at  03:33 PM

    << Back to main



Toronto News
MESH Cities
Spacing
Blogto.com
CBC Toronto
Torontoist.com
Toronto Galleries



Related Links
Toronto Stories by
Stats
Toronto Links
Your Opinions


Other Blogs
News Sources
Syndicate